IOM Releases New Report on Graduate Medical Education


On July 29, 2014, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (IOM) released a report on Graduate Medical Education (GME), entitled Graduate Medical Education That Meets the Nation’s Health NeedsThe 2001 IOM report, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, sparked debate and policy changes on health care quality that initiated changes in the law and payment structures relating to the health care system. There is every reason to believe that the GME report will have a similar impact on academic medical centers and teaching hospitals.

The report is the result of an independent review of the governance and financing of the graduate medical education system in the United States.

The 21 member IOM committee found that despite billions of public dollars being spent on GME since its inception in 1965 ($15 billion in 2012 alone, approximately $9.7 of which came from Medicare), there is minimal transparency or accountability in the GME financing system for producing the types of physicians that the nation needs. The committee calls for reforms in the way Medicare GME funds are allocated and increased oversight and accountability. Continue reading this entry

Appellate Courts Split on Validity of Key ACA Regulation

CMS Releases Medicare Part B Supplier Billing and Payment Data

In two important decisions issued July 22, 2014, both addressing the validity of a key regulation promulgated under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), two federal appeals courts reached opposite conclusions, possibly setting the stage for another ACA showdown in the Supreme Court. The two cases, Halbig v. Burwell (formerly Halbig v. Sebelius) and King v. Burwell, address the issue of whether the tax subsidies that are payable to qualifying persons who buy insurance from the exchanges created by the ACA are limited to purchasers who buy from state operated exchanges, or whether such subsides are also available to purchasers from a federally operated exchange. Continue reading this entry

HRSA Issues Interpretive Rule on 340B Drug Pricing Program


On July 21, 2014, the Health Resource and Services Administration (HRSA) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a new interpretive rule addressing the treatment of orphan drugs by certain hospital covered entities participating in the 340B Drug Pricing Program (340B Program). The new rule is available on HRSA’s website, and will be announced in the Federal Register on July 23, 2014. The rule is effective immediately. Continue reading this entry

SEC's MCDC Initiative - The Clock is Ticking


Not-for-profit health care providers that have borrowed on a tax-exempt basis within the last five years should be aware of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation (“MCDC”) Initiative. The MCDC Initiative applies to municipal issuers and obligated persons, such as tax-exempt hospital borrowers, that provided materially misleading disclosure in Official Statements issued within the past five years regarding compliance with their continuing disclosure obligations under SEC Rule 15c2-12. The SEC is offering to enter into settlements pursuant to which such borrowers neither admit nor deny wrongdoing, but agree to a cease and desist order against future misleading disclosure and agree to certain undertakings, such as remedying all past disclosure failures, cooperating with subsequent SEC investigations, disclosing the settlement terms for five years in Official Statements, and establishing training programs regarding continuing disclosure obligations. However, the MCDC Initiative expires on September 10, 2014. After that date, the SEC has indicated that penalties for such misleading disclosure are likely to be more severe and may include fines. Continue reading this entry

Home Health Care Within Independent Living Communities


Operators Should Keep an Eye on Regulations and Regulatory Developments

The provision of home health care services within independent living facilities (ILFs) is becoming more commonplace in some areas, allowing some ILF communities (which in most states are unregulated) to provide services to residents that includes care similar to the care provided in a typical assisted living community (which are licensed and regulated). This may include coordinating the provision of such home health care services through truly independent third-party agencies or, in some instances, though affiliates of the facility operator or owner. That said, what may feel to some ILF operators as a useful and typical optional service made available to ILF residents comes with regulatory concerns that must be monitored. Continue reading this entry