The Florida Board of Medicine recently met and voted to uphold a rule allowing controlled substances to be prescribed via telemedicine for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. This change has enormous potential to benefit patients in the Sunshine State, promoting access to mental health services and receiving the full scope of psychiatric treatment. Providers of telemedicine-based services, as well as providers of psychiatric services, should take this opportunity to explore the possibilities of offering care via telemedicine for psychiatric disorders.
Last year, the Board granted special waivers to three psychiatric mental health organizations, allowing them to prescribe controlled substances via telemedicine. Based, at least in part, on the successful results of those trailblazers, the Board determined to revise the regulation and permit the practice without a waiver process.
The change is to subsection (4) of Florida Administrative Code r. 64B8-9.0141 (Standards for Telemedicine Practice). With the amended rule, the regulation will now state as follows:
(4) Controlled substances shall not be prescribed through the use of telemedicine except for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. This provision does not preclude physicians from ordering controlled substances through the use of telemedicine for patients hospitalized in a facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 395, F.S.
Florida’s approach is consistent with new remote prescribing rules among a growing number of states (e.g., Delaware, New Hampshire) that are electing to defer to the physician’s independent medical judgment and prevailing standard of care, allowing controlled substances to be prescribed via telemedicine. This differs from the approach of imposing specific telemedicine practice standards that notably differ from in-person medical encounters.
The Board’s current telemedicine regulations were originally issued in the Spring of 2014 and reflect a flexible framework thoughtfully designed to allow physicians to offer care using new technologies without arbitrary barriers to the practice of medicine. The Legislature may pick up the bill again next year, but until then, the Board regulations represent the most current guidance for Florida telemedicine practitioners.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.